01-09-2021, 08:12 PM
Thanks, but I usually like to look at things objectively and is nice to say, "If I value a GM's x skill this and their y skill that, how does that make them match up to other GMs?"
I'll admit, some of the individual grades may have been generic. Some are what they are, because I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other. For your grades, no they weren't negatively impacted by the Patrick deal. It was made known that a number of other suitors offered more, so that was more of an error on the other GM than it was you. You got a "3" Ethics grade, because I think your trade prices generally suck and are hoping for a soggy all-day sucker.
I'll admit, some of the individual grades may have been generic. Some are what they are, because I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other. For your grades, no they weren't negatively impacted by the Patrick deal. It was made known that a number of other suitors offered more, so that was more of an error on the other GM than it was you. You got a "3" Ethics grade, because I think your trade prices generally suck and are hoping for a soggy all-day sucker.
Cleveland Record: 5463-4790 (.533) [2054-2071, 2083-2104, 2110-2133]
AL Post: 15 (ALC), 11 (WC) - ALDS Win: 11 - ALCS Champ: 6 - WS Champ: 3
ALW: Mariners + Angels Record: 1072-864 (.554) [2042-2048, 2105-2110]
AL Post: 3 (ALW), 4 (WC) - ALDS Win: 3 - ALCS Champ: 1 - WS Champ: 1
NLW: Rockies + Padres Record: 3230-2753 (.540) [2017-2042, 2072-2082]
NL Post: 18 (NLW), 4 (WC) - NLDS Win: 7 - NLCS Champ: 4 - WS Champ: 0