The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable - Line: 906 - File: showthread.php PHP 7.4.33 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php 906 errorHandler->error_callback




 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Rule 5 Suggestion
#1
It's been suggested round and round. The big problem has always been that "teams would need to post their 40-man protect lists". Well, with my idea these wouldn't be needed. Much like in real life when a player is called up to the MLB roster and acquires service time, he's added to the 40-man roster.

So, what I am proposing is that any player on your team with MLB Service Time is considered to already be on your 40-man roster. You will then have the ability to fill in the remaining spots with eligible minor leaguers. I'm willing to take on this project and attached is a complete rundown of the process and an example from when this season started.

Some things to note is that I understand that some players have MLB stats, but no MLB Service Time. This is because Mogul makes you call up a full 40-man roster in September regardless of if they're a qualified candidate. In the real world, teams only call up an additional 5 or so players. So this is allowing for leniency for when Mogul makes you call up players that you don't want in the majors.

Also, I like a concrete age rather than figuring when a player was drafted, how old he was on draft day, and then figuring out who's eligible. The date I think is the most appropriate is March 1 as the off-season dust has pretty much settled by this point. If we're using 40-man rosters I think 22+ age players should be eligible. I would have no problem using a 35-man roster protect, but at that point I think eligible players should be ages 23+.

Once the March 1 file is posted I would work to on an excel file the will look like the attached file. I will create a thread once completed and each team would then need to respond with who their additional protects are.

I've provided what I find are the three different examples that we will come across in the league:

1. A team that can protect additional players, but will still have player eligible to be taken. (ARI)
2. A team that can protect all of it's eligible players and still have room left to make Rule 5 selections. (ATL)
3. A team that has more than 40 players with MLB Service Time and will have to decide upon players to drop. (CLE)


Attached Files
.xls   FCM Rule 5.xls (Size: 74.5 KB / Downloads: 4)
Cle

Cleveland Record5304-4625 (.534) [2054-2071, 2083-2104, 2110-2131]
AL Post: 15 (ALC), 11 (WC) - ALDS Win: 11 - ALCS Champ: 6 - WS Champ: 3

ALW: Mariners + Angels Record: 1072-864 (.554) [2042-2048, 2105-2110]
AL Post: 3 (ALW), 4 (WC) - ALDS Win: 3 - ALCS Champ: 1 - WS Champ: 1

NLW: Rockies + Padres Record: 3230-2753 (.540) [2017-2042, 2072-2082]
NL Post: 18 (NLW), 4 (WC) - NLDS Win: 7 - NLCS Champ: 4 - WS Champ: 0
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Messages In This Thread
Rule 5 Suggestion - by mattynokes - 06-27-2011, 09:50 PM
RE: Rule 5 Suggestion - by Cdawg - 06-27-2011, 10:21 PM
RE: Rule 5 Suggestion - by mattynokes - 06-27-2011, 10:23 PM
RE: Rule 5 Suggestion - by Jordan - 06-28-2011, 01:52 AM
RE: Rule 5 Suggestion - by GoIrish - 06-28-2011, 02:19 AM
RE: Rule 5 Suggestion - by mattynokes - 06-28-2011, 01:19 PM
RE: Rule 5 Suggestion - by jhc54 - 06-28-2011, 01:27 PM
RE: Rule 5 Suggestion - by mike - 06-28-2011, 02:42 PM
RE: Rule 5 Suggestion - by mattynokes - 06-28-2011, 02:59 PM
RE: Rule 5 Suggestion - by rockybull - 06-28-2011, 04:03 PM

Forum Jump: