12-16-2011, 02:22 PM
12-16-2011, 07:39 PM
Compensation changes, sure, but Sandwich round, hell no. It's like the Rule V draft. It sounds nice and would be a great addition to the league, but the additional work probably isn't worth it.
I think the arbitration figures for SPs (and possibly RPs) need to different than regular position players. There's 150 starting pitchers while there's just 30 starters at a given defensive position. If we're using the top 7/15 for those with 30 starters at each position, I'd say something like the top 20/40 for SPs would be good (and maybe something like top 10/20 for RPs).
I think the arbitration figures for SPs (and possibly RPs) need to different than regular position players. There's 150 starting pitchers while there's just 30 starters at a given defensive position. If we're using the top 7/15 for those with 30 starters at each position, I'd say something like the top 20/40 for SPs would be good (and maybe something like top 10/20 for RPs).
12-17-2011, 05:10 PM
i just dont believe a sandwich round works within the confines of a 6 round draft, no way
12-17-2011, 05:19 PM
I don't think a sandwich round works either, going to be too much of a headache to get figured out with 2011 mogul. I don't mind changing the comp to 2nd and 3rd round for A and B though.